Alaska Recount Laws

This information was updated November 7, 2022.

Voting System Used

Mixed paper ballot and DREs with VVPAT

According to the Media Packet issued by the Division of Elections for the 2018 primary election, Alaska uses three methods to count ballots at the precinct level: hand-count (137 precincts), optical scaners (304 precincts), and touch screen with VVPAT.  Nintey-nine percent of all voters in Alaska cast a paper ballot. The touch screen voting units are used by one percent of the voters. Media Packet, page 24. 

For more details, visit Verified Voting.

Counting Method

Mix of hand count and retabulation
Required hand count of a sample of ballots in addition to other counting methods

For votes cast on direct-recording electronic machines, (DREs), the voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) is the official ballot during a recount and must be counted by hand. If the VVPAT is not “available” or “readable,” an electronic review is conducted. See the Alaska Administrative Code, Title 6 (6 AAC), Chapter 25, Article 1, Rule 25.200.  This rule also states that a recount may be conducted by retabulation as long as it includes a sample hand-count verification of the recount results from one precinct per house district; however, all ballots are reviewed by hand.  "In conducting the recount, the director shall review all ballots...to determine which ballots, or part of ballots, were properly marked and which ballots are to be counted in the recount, and shall check the accuracy of the original count, the precinct certificate, and the review."  2017 Alaska Statutes (AS), Section 15.20.480

Initiating Mechanisms

Close vote margin
Candidate-initiated
Voter-initiated

Close Vote Margin Options

Initiated automatically (for tie votes)
Initiated by request (for candidate and voter requested recounts)

A tie vote is the only vote margin that automatically initiates a recount in Alaska. AS § 15.15.460.  If after a recount and appeal the candidates have been determined to have the same number of votes for office, the winner will be selected by lot. AS § 15.20.530.

See the cost sections for Candidate and Voter-initiated recounts below for a description of the close-vote-margin recounts available by request. 

Timing: In the case of a tie vote, the Director of Elections is required to “immediately proceed with the recount. AS § 15.15.460.

Candidate-Initiated Options

Candidate determines how many/which precincts to recount

Any defeated candidate may request a recount. There are no restrictions on the type of election in which a recount may be requested or limiting the eligibility of certain offices for a recount.  Note the different filing deadlines. The deadline for the offices of governor and lieutenant governor is within three days after the completion of the review. The deadline for other candidates is within five days after the completion of the review.  AS § 15.20.430.  The recount application must state “in substance the basis of the belief that a mistake has been made” and state the particular election precinct or house district for which the recount is to be held as well as the particular office for which the recount is to be held. AS § 15.20.440.

Timing: AS § 15.20.430, 15.20.460, and 15.20.480.

Voter-Initiated Options

Voters determine how many/which precincts to recount
Voters may request recounts for offices
Voters may request recounts for initiatives/questions

Voters may request a recount for propositions, ballot questions and offices, but a minimum of ten qualified voters is needed to make the request within five days after the completion of the state review.  There are no restrictions on the type of election in which a recount may be requested or limiting the eligibility of certain offices for a recount. AS § 15.20.430. The recount application must state “in substance the basis of the belief that a mistake has been made” and state the particular election precinct or house district for which the recount is to be held as well as the particular office, proposition, or question for which the recount is to be held.  AS § 15.20.440.

Timing:  AS § 15.20.43015.20.460 and 15.20.480

Cost for Candidate-Initiated Recounts

Initiator pays set or per jurisdiction fee
Initiator pays deposit or bond before recount
Payer of costs depends on outcome of recount
 

The initiator must pay a deposit of $1,000 for each precinct, $2,000 for each house district, or $15,000 for the entire state.  "[i]f ... the difference between the number of votes cast ... was less than .5 percent of the total number of votes cast for the two candidates for the contested office, or a question or proposition for which ... the difference between the number of votes cast in favor of or opposed to the issue was 20 or less or was less than .5 percent of the total votes cast in favor of or opposed to the issue, the application need not include a deposit and the state shall bear the cost of the recount." AS § 15.20.450.

The cost is paid entirely by the initiator unless the vote total changes by four percent or more in favor of the initiator, or if the recount changes the outcome of the election, in which case the deposit will be refunded.

Cost for Voter-Initiated Recounts

Initiator pays set or per jurisdiction fee
Initiator pays deposit or bond before recount
Payer of costs depends on outcome of recount

The costs and the statutory provision are the same as for the candidate-initiated recounts.  See above.

Challengers and Observers

Party/candidate or initiator has statutory authority to appoint observers
No statutory guidance provided for recount challengers

While AS § 15.20.470 mandates notification of candidates, initiators, their representatives, and “other directly interested parties,” it does not mandate notifying the public. We did not find any statute requiring that the recount be conducted publicly.

AS § 15.20.440 allows recount initiators two representatives, one of whom may be the initiator, to “be present and assist during the recount.” Subsection (b) also allows for observers for "candidates, political parties, or organized groups having a direct interest in a recount.” There is no mention made of these observers having the ability to challenge ballots.  However, AS § 15.20.480 suggests that challenges to ballot interpretations do happen. It states that the “rules in AS 15.15.360 governing the counting of ballots shall be followed in the recount when a ballot is challenged on the basis of a question regarding the voter’s intent to vote for the candidate, proposition, or question.” In addition, the Recount Handbook, published by the Alaska Division of Elections, states that the “Director of the Division of Elections is the final authority at the recount. If any candidate or representative disagrees with the determination made by the Director, the ballot is placed in a separate envelope with the name of the challenger, the ballot’s district and/or precinct number, and the name of the candidate for which the ballot was counted written on the outside.”

Finally, according to 6 AAC 25.200, “all recounts will be conducted in the director’s office or at another site in Juneau, selected by the director.” 

Rules for Determining Voter Intent

Statutory guidance provided

Alaska statute provides a detailed set of rules for interpreting voter intent. AS § 15.15.360.  See also the pictoral examples for interpreting voter intent on page 9 in the Recount Manual

State Has Audit Laws
Yes
Revision Notes

Links reviewed for currency November 2022.

This information was updated November 2022 using the then-current version of the Alaska Statues and the Alaska Administrative Code

 


Source URL: https://ceimn.org/recount-and-audit-laws/recount-laws-database/alaska