Editorials: Allowing ballot audits preserves integrity far better than disenfranchising voters | The Keene Sentinel

November 27, 2017

Earlier this year, the GOP-led Legislature was quick to jump on the notion that our state’s elections are a fragile, vulnerable thing in need of shoring up. Their answer, backed by Gov. Chris Sununu, was to make it harder for new voters to cast their ballots. It was a transparent attempt to limit voting by those who might be more likely to vote Democrat — the poor; new Massachusetts transplants; and, most of all, college students. And their effort — Senate Bill 3 — is being challenged in the courts. At the same time, lawmakers made clear they don’t really value the integrity of our state’s elections, by killing in committee a bill to authorize local moderators to conduct verification recounts of machine-counted ballots. Senate Bill 109 couldn’t have been any simpler. It would have added a paragraph of language to existing election law saying local moderators have the discretion to conduct recounts to verify machine results.
After years of trying unsuccessfully to convince the Secretary of State’s Office that local ballots ought to be subject to auditing by local officials to ensure accuracy of machine-counting, a group of lawmakers — Swanzey Republican Jim McConnell and Peterborough Democrat Ivy Vann among them — is again proposing legislation to allow for local auditing of ballots.

Read more>