News

Brennan Center Criticizes Supreme Court Decision to Uphold Indiana Voter ID Law

April 28, 2008

While Court Leaves Door Open For Future Challenges to Restrictive ID Laws, Center Calls on Lawmakers Across Country to Enact Laws That Protect the Right to Vote

Today the Brennan Center for Justice criticized the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold Indiana's voter identification law  the strictest in the country  but noted that the decision did not give other states a blank check to block eligible voters.  The Brennan Center called on lawmakers across the country to reject similar laws and to pass affirmative legislation protecting the right to vote.

Maryland Funds New Voting System

April 6, 2008

By SaveOurVotes.org      Yesterday the Maryland General Assembly approved the Fiscal Year 2009 budget, including funding to move Maryland by 2010 to a less expensive, recountable voting system based on optically scanned paper ballots. This highly popular switch, favored by nearly two thirds of voters statewide, was enacted last year in matching bills sponsored by Sen. Edward Kasemeyer (D - Baltimore and Howard Counties) and Del.

New rules open doors for new voters

April 3, 2008

New rules open doors for new voters
Column: As I See It

Cook County News-Herald

Josh Winters,Guest columnist

Our democracy just got a little bit wider. New rules adopted this week by the Minnesota Secretary of State’s Office will expand access to our electoral process. The rules provide new opportunities to engage underrepresented communities in the political process by expanding access for students, people with disabilities, people experiencing homelessness and more.

Americans still wary of voting machines for 2008

March 23, 2008

by Rob LeverAgence France-Presse via Inquirer.net
 

WASHINGTON--Eight years after glitches marred the 2000 presidential elections, Americans are still struggling over voting machine technology amid growing concerns about the reliability of electronic systems.

Editorial - Unreliable Voting in New Jersey

March 22, 2008

New York Times

Voters nationwide have seen that electronic voting cannot be trusted, and New Jerseyans are the latest to learn this unfortunate lesson. It is now clear that the state’s machines produced suspicious results in the Feb. 5 presidential primary. Rather than working to put doubts to rest, the machines’ manufacturer is resisting a proper inquiry. New Jersey needs to quickly get to the bottom of the problem to ensure voters that in November their ballots will be counted accurately.

Syndicate content